Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- talk:discuss:goals [2017/06/26 15:46] – created lektu
+++ talk:discuss:goals [2017/07/03 07:37] (current) – lektu
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
   * **Errata** for published material, both 1.0/1.1 and 2.0
   * **House rules** (these go in [[discuss:fan_proposed_materials|Fan Proposed Materials]] perhaps?)
-  * Notes on **compatibility** with 1.0/1.1 modules.
+  * Notes on **compatibility** with old 1.0/1.1 modules and missions.
- --- //[[lekktu@gmail.com|Juanma Barranquero]] 2017/06/26 15:45//
+--- //[[lekktu@gmail.com|Juanma Barranquero]] 2017/06/26 15:45//
+[[discuss:timelines_and_universe_fluff|Timelines and Universe stuff]] is for the canonical background, I suppose. What kind of material will be in the wiki? (Art, race descriptions, planet data, etc.)
+ --- //[[lekktu@gmail.com|Juanma Barranquero]] 2017/06/26 15:47//
+> I think only fan art is likely to be here.  Official art is staying in official hardcopy products.  But fluff could be people writing about different parts of any of the official planets for example.  We should define what we want in the wiki - should we allow fanfiction and after action reports for example?  --- //[[curufea@yahoo.com|Peter Cobcroft]] 2017/06/26 17:45//
+Fanfiction, fanart, after action reports... Definitely yes, I'd say. As for "official art", I didn't mean full page illustrations, but if we have a page about Tentacs, can we use an official Tentac illustration? --- //[[lekktu@gmail.com|Juanma Barranquero]] 2017/06/27 02:19//
+> Not yet - but possibly in the future (ie I don't have access to that art, and Jeff hasn't okayed it yet).  My personal preference is to instead have a photo of a painted miniature for such a thing - as it would be immediately identifiable in-game.   --- //[[curufea@yahoo.com|Peter Cobcroft]] 2017/06/27 18:11//
+Hmm, good idea for minis. But for other things, it's a bit weird to discuss the Teleporter module, for example, and not having an image of it, even if low-res. I suppose we could use pictures too...  --- //[[lekktu@gmail.com|Juanma Barranquero]] 2017/06/28 01:55//
+> I'm keen for simplified png or gif images for modules. They're the most common images used and if we go for a non scanned version that's simple, it'll be light on the bandwidth and viewable in a variety of screen sizes (I will be testing mobile accessibility)  --- //[[curufea@yahoo.com|Peter Cobcroft]] 2017/07/03 04:25//
+Low-res PNGs of the old modules' images (which are simpler and less colorful than the new ones) would be another way (they'd be small and recognizable). But I'm OK with simplified images too; no big deal. --- //[[lekktu@gmail.com|Juanma Barranquero]] 2017/07/03 07:34//

Heroic Adventure

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools