tracker:ship:redundant_ii_curufea:upgradediscussion
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tracker:ship:redundant_ii_curufea:upgradediscussion [2017/11/30 19:25] – mark | tracker:ship:redundant_ii_curufea:upgradediscussion [2017/12/04 00:27] (current) – [Flippy Nips] This is where a commander is required. And with my military background I am ultimately the most qualified for the job. We go with the Kerbite layout, mudmuppet | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
| We only have one science station which accumulates usage markers and [[tracker: | We only have one science station which accumulates usage markers and [[tracker: | ||
| "They have a skill level of 3 in their profession and are entitled to a professional reroll. In all other skills, they have an effective skill level of 1." | "They have a skill level of 3 in their profession and are entitled to a professional reroll. In all other skills, they have an effective skill level of 1." | ||
| - | It is possible to upgrade them with a engineering mod, combat mod and a Toolkit for an effective combat skill of 4 and engineering of 3. That would take 3 upgrade rolls. Fail that roll and "Any failed Upgrade attempt destroys the bot irrevocably." | + | It is possible to upgrade them with a engineering mod, combat mod and a Toolkit for an effective combat skill of 4 and engineering of <del>3</ |
| + | So a bot would definitely be useful but preferably used for simple things. | ||
| + | Actually that should be engineering 2 for things like reconfiguring cannons TN8 so 6+ on the dice. The toolkit adds for upgrades, repairs, installation in cargo bay and putting out fires. | ||
| + | [Tktkah] Also, I'm not an all rounder, Combat 4 Science 4 in the last mission, which meant my combat was at least equal highest in the group ([[tracker: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Toowheet-Twoo] Yes the bot would need to be upgraded, it would be able to fire off a missile and reconfigure cannons and handle closer cannon shots. It's not a great success rate about 70% after the first upgrade depending where you start, improved by further upgrades, but it's better than those modules sitting there unused while power is going unpumped. \\ You could just say your combat is at 4 and you're planning to use the cannon instead of having me type out an explanation that you already understood, just so you could get upset that I clearly haven’t studied your stats. You need to say what you're planning and not expect mind reading. I was working on the basis that we had two scientists, if you're not really sciencing much and therefore would fully utilise the cannon then the bot would probably be better spent elsewhere. I did not mean to threaten your job with automation. ;-) \\ I've already tried to bow out of this bizarrely hostile conversation it doesn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Tktkah] The conversation isn't meant to be hostile. However I've commented that I would be on a cannon and kept getting ignored so it was a bit irritating. From above: \\ | ||
| + | "Also I'm not going to be in science so will be likely to be on one of the cannons" | ||
| + | " | ||
| + | |||
| + | I gave up on trying to actually design a ship a while ago and was accepting that you had a design that you wanted and that we were going with that. I was trying to understand how it would work and where I was going to fit in as all the positions seemed filled and there wasn't actually anything for me to do. It had felt that you were writing me out of the game. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Flippy Nips] We obviously need a commander and as I am the most qualified, we go with the Kerbite ship, and replace one life support with a cannon - AND we take the mission to kill ourselves without shame. | ||
tracker/ship/redundant_ii_curufea/upgradediscussion.1512098734.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/11/30 19:25 by mark
