tracker:ship:redundant_ii_curufea:upgradediscussion
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tracker:ship:redundant_ii_curufea:upgradediscussion [2017/12/01 01:35] – mark | tracker:ship:redundant_ii_curufea:upgradediscussion [2017/12/04 00:27] (current) – [Flippy Nips] This is where a commander is required. And with my military background I am ultimately the most qualified for the job. We go with the Kerbite layout, mudmuppet | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 192: | Line 192: | ||
| I gave up on trying to actually design a ship a while ago and was accepting that you had a design that you wanted and that we were going with that. I was trying to understand how it would work and where I was going to fit in as all the positions seemed filled and there wasn't actually anything for me to do. It had felt that you were writing me out of the game. | I gave up on trying to actually design a ship a while ago and was accepting that you had a design that you wanted and that we were going with that. I was trying to understand how it would work and where I was going to fit in as all the positions seemed filled and there wasn't actually anything for me to do. It had felt that you were writing me out of the game. | ||
| - | "Also I'm not going to be in science so will be likely to be on one of the cannons" | + | |
| - | " | + | [Flippy Nips] We obviously need a commander and as I am the most qualified, we go with the Kerbite ship, and replace |
tracker/ship/redundant_ii_curufea/upgradediscussion.1512120920.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/12/01 01:35 by mark
